IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
--- ajit sinha <sinha_a99@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > --- Pen-L Fred Moseley <fmoseley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > Ajit, what about capital goods used only for the > > production > > of non-basic goods? > ____________________ > In that case that capital good is a non-basic and a > tech change in that capital good will have influence > on the values of only those non-basics to which it > is > an input. But this is a particular case and should > not > be used for a general argument. > _____________________ > >Fred: > > The further removed a capital good is from the > > production of > > a given final good, the less effect a change in > the > > value of > > the capital good will have on the price of > > production of the > > final good. > ____________________ > But it also depends upon the rate of profits and not > just how removed it is form the good. Take a look at > Sraffa's chapter 6 on dated labor. __________ Fred, I'm sorry. This applies to prices and not labor-values. So in the case of labor-values your distance argument would probably be right. But still it will have some influence. Cheers, ajit sinha __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, ajit sinha Wed 18 Apr 2007, 16:05 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, Rakesh Bhandari Wed 18 Apr 2007, 19:14 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, Pen-L Fred Moseley Sun 22 Apr 2007, 14:11 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, ajit sinha Mon 23 Apr 2007, 13:05 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, ajit sinha Mon 23 Apr 2007, 15:32 GMT