IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Rakesh Bhandari wrote:
I should have appended this quote to my post:
This example of fixed capital--and in the context of reprouction on a constant scale--is a striking one. A disproportionate production of fixed and circulating capital is a factor much favoured by the economists in their explanation of crises. It is something new to them that a disproportion of this can and must arise from the mere *maintainence* of the fixed capital; that it can and msut arise on the assumption of an ideal normal functioning, whith simple reproduction of the social capital already functioning." [from Capital, II]
Looking at Capital II, I think I see what the issue is. Marx explicitly assumes a constant scale of production and constant productivity of labour, but there's one other issue that can cause problems, namely, an uneven demand over time for replacement of the means of production corresponding to the fixed capital.
Suppose each capitalist uses a machine that costs $100,000 and lasts 4 years before it becomes useless.
From the micro perspective there's no problem: the capitalist sets
aside $25,000 per year by way of depreciation allowance (abstracting from interest paid on such funds) and buys a new machine every 4 years.
From the macro perspective there's no problem if the vintages of
the machines are conveniently staggered such that an equal number come up for replacement each year. (In a sense this is the "natural" assumption for a tidy-minded economist contemplating simple reproduction.)
But Marx raises the possibility that this convenient staggering does not obtain: that is, "a greater part of IIc expires [this year] than did the year before".
If there's a temporal lumpiness to the replacement of fixed capital, it's easy enough to see how this could create problems for simple reproduction. "All of a sudden" there's a greater demand for machines than in the previous year. The price of machines rises. Resources are diverted into machine production. There's a corresponding shortage of the goods figuring as circulating capital. Simple reproduction is screwed.
Allin.
- [OPE-L] simple reproduction, (continued)
- [OPE-L] simple reproduction, Rakesh Bhandari Sat 31 Mar 2007, 02:21 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] simple reproduction, Allin Cottrell Sat 31 Mar 2007, 03:18 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] simple reproduction, Rakesh Bhandari Sat 31 Mar 2007, 03:48 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] simple reproduction, Rakesh Bhandari Sat 31 Mar 2007, 04:02 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] simple reproduction, Allin Cottrell Sat 31 Mar 2007, 23:52 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] simple reproduction, Rakesh Bhandari Sat 31 Mar 2007, 23:59 GMT