IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
[Diego wrote:] > Now, you and Jerry can easily see why we should keep dealing with the TP. > Because we need to find referees that don't hamper our work because they don't > understand what we are doing. > Don't you think this is an important reason? No. In solidarity, Jerry
- Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem" continue?, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem" continue?, Paul Cockshott Mon 26 Mar 2007, 20:46 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem" continue?, Ian Wright Wed 28 Mar 2007, 16:39 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem" continue?, Paul Cockshott Thu 29 Mar 2007, 08:21 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem"continue?, Diego Guerrero Tue 27 Mar 2007, 20:00 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem"continue?, Jerry Levy Tue 27 Mar 2007, 20:41 GMT
- [OPE-L] Custers militarism, Rakesh Bhandari Wed 28 Mar 2007, 02:21 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Custers militarism, Dogan Goecmen Wed 28 Mar 2007, 06:38 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem"continue?, paul cockshott Wed 28 Mar 2007, 08:54 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem" continue?, Paul Cockshott Sun 25 Mar 2007, 22:03 GMT