IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Ian Wright wrote:
I am trying to find out, if they think our empirical data is wrong, or do they think that even in the absence of a general rate of profit there is still a transformation problem
Uniform profits is a simplifying assumption. The debate on the TP could take place with a price of production equation that replaces the single r with a diagonal matrix of r's. Uniform profits is not the cause of the TP (the mere presence of profits is).
Reposting my question on this:
Ian, could you explain why you think that is the case?
(In a historical sense, Adam Smith believed this; then Ricardo pointed out why Smith was wrong. But I don't suppose your grounds are the same as Smith's.)
-- Allin Cottrell Department of Economics Wake Forest University, NC
- Re: [OPE-L] transformation, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] transformation, Paul Cockshott Sun 25 Mar 2007, 21:56 GMT
- [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem" continue?, Jerry Levy Sun 25 Mar 2007, 20:53 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem" continue?, Paul Cockshott Sun 25 Mar 2007, 21:45 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem" continue?, Ian Wright Mon 26 Mar 2007, 16:15 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem" continue?, Allin Cottrell Mon 26 Mar 2007, 19:43 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem" continue?, Ian Wright Mon 26 Mar 2007, 20:07 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem" continue?, Allin Cottrell Tue 27 Mar 2007, 00:55 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem" continue?, Charlie Mon 26 Mar 2007, 21:53 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem" continue?, Paul Cockshott Mon 26 Mar 2007, 20:46 GMT