IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
> > <http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a4_132.html>
> Having checked your reference it appears that these debates
> were an early investigation as to whether Angels followed Fermi-Dirac
> or Bose-Einstein statistics, and as we now know, the latter
> has some pretty damned weird consequences.
Hi Paul C:
OK, I'll a couple of bites: a small and a large bite:
[putting aside the Estimation of the Magnitude of the Spatial
Concentration of Angels Question:]
small bite: what are the "pretty damned weird consequences"
of B-E statistics?
large bite: what advances and ongoing debates in physics have
occurred in the last 30 years which Marxians interested in
political economy should be aware of?
(others on the list are also invited to offer answers to the 2nd
question.)
In solidarity, Jerry
- [OPE-L] Custers militarism, (continued)
- [OPE-L] Custers militarism, Rakesh Bhandari Wed 28 Mar 2007, 02:21 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Custers militarism, Dogan Goecmen Wed 28 Mar 2007, 06:38 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem"continue?, paul cockshott Wed 28 Mar 2007, 08:54 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] why does the debate on the "transformation problem" continue?, Paul Cockshott Sun 25 Mar 2007, 22:03 GMT
- [OPE-L] advances and ongoing debates in physics and statistical mechanics?, Jerry Levy Mon 26 Mar 2007, 14:50 GMT
- [OPE-L] Equivalent value and relative value, Philip Dunn Mon 26 Mar 2007, 02:45 GMT
- [OPE-L] All power to the computer?, Jurriaan Bendien Sun 25 Mar 2007, 15:00 GMT
- [OPE-L] (new book) Randy Martin, _An Empire of Indifference_, glevy Sun 25 Mar 2007, 13:26 GMT
- [OPE-L] [Fwd: Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values], glevy Sat 24 Mar 2007, 16:17 GMT