OPE-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]
Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values

You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it. 

But that still leaves unaddressed this point: you are just
asserting--not demonstrating or proving--that the prices of
production of the mop and mos bought with the initial M had to have
been the same as the
prices of production which you derive with your sequential monetary
macro method predicated on the LTV.

Simply put, there is a difference between assertion and demonstration. 

Hi Rakesh,

I am not sure what kind of ?demonstration? you are looking for, but
attached is a simple two-sector numerical example, in which C = Pmp and
(V + S) = Pms.

Is this the sort of thing you have in mind?

Comradely,
Fred


----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Attachment: numex.doc
Description: MS-Word document

[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]