IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
>>>I think that this is the most important advance in Diego's recent work >>>- developing Marx's theory beyond Capital to lower levels of >>>abstraction, at which the initial given (and unchanging) magnitudes of >>>C and V are explained more fully. <<<<<<<<<<< >> Which work(s) by Diego are you referring to? > His recent postings on OPEL and a recent paper that he has circulated > and discussed on OPEL. Fred: I assume you mean the 1st (1/07) draft of "The labour theory of value, and the double transformation problem" at: <http://www.countdownnet.info/archivio/teoria/521.doc> Diego did not circulate his paper on the list but he did provide the above url. I'm still not sure _which_ levels of abstraction you are referring to when you say "lower levels" .... In solidarity, Jerry
- [OPE-L] advances and ongoing debates in physics and statistical mechanics?, (continued)
- [OPE-L] advances and ongoing debates in physics and statistical mechanics?, Jerry Levy Mon 26 Mar 2007, 14:50 GMT
- [OPE-L] Equivalent value and relative value, Philip Dunn Mon 26 Mar 2007, 02:45 GMT
- [OPE-L] All power to the computer?, Jurriaan Bendien Sun 25 Mar 2007, 15:00 GMT
- [OPE-L] (new book) Randy Martin, _An Empire of Indifference_, glevy Sun 25 Mar 2007, 13:26 GMT
- [OPE-L] [Fwd: Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values], glevy Sat 24 Mar 2007, 16:17 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] [Fwd: Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values], Pen-L Fred Moseley Sun 25 Mar 2007, 14:02 GMT
- [OPE-L] _Capital_ and Empire: An Interview with John Bellamy Foster, glevy Sat 24 Mar 2007, 11:22 GMT
- [OPE-L] Tobin Tax, Jurriaan Bendien Sat 24 Mar 2007, 00:18 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [OPE-L] Tobin Tax, Jurriaan Bendien Sun 25 Mar 2007, 13:03 GMT