IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Rakesh Bhandari wrote:
I agree that [Marx's theory of fetishism] is obscure in that as Elster has argued it's not clear that anyone actually thinks that value is an instrinsic property such as weight.
Mass, perhaps? Weight is not intrinsic, it depends on the local gravitational field. (The mass of Capital vol III is the same on the moon as here on earth, but the weight is not.)
Allin.
- Re: [OPE-L] Value and price (again), (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Value and price (again), Jerry Levy Sun 04 Mar 2007, 16:12 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] salto mortale, Rakesh Bhandari Sat 03 Mar 2007, 16:39 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] salto mortale, Allin Cottrell Sat 03 Mar 2007, 17:30 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] salto mortale, Rakesh Bhandari Sat 03 Mar 2007, 18:09 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] salto mortale, Allin Cottrell Sun 04 Mar 2007, 00:48 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] salto mortale, Rakesh Bhandari Sun 04 Mar 2007, 01:10 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] salto mortale, Allin Cottrell Sun 04 Mar 2007, 03:05 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [OPE-L] salto mortale, Jurriaan Bendien Sun 04 Mar 2007, 13:19 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] salto mortale, Jerry Levy Sun 04 Mar 2007, 16:14 GMT