IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Fred "Pen-L" Moseley wrote:
Quoting Diego Guerrero <diego.guerrero@xxxxxxxxxx>:
You have now understood my "m".
Thanks, I am glad to finally understand your "m". And I would say that you have finally explained more clearly what you mean by "m". This is a very important point, and should not be buried in footnote 24 of your paper...
I agree with Fred. I think most people will assume that by "market prices" you mean the actual prices at which goods change hands in the market, with all their day-to-day and place-to-place micro-variation.
But it turns out you're wanting to interpolate a further layer between prices of production and day-to-day market prices. I see how this might make sense, but I believe there's still an important ambiguity here. Do you mean
(a) To give these "market prices" of yours a theoretical determination, or
(b) Do you mean to treat them simply as time- and space-averages of actual market prices?
Here's the point: If I say that "labour values" (the labour-times required to produce things) form centres of gravitation for market prices, I'm saying something substantive (maybe true, maybe false, but substantive). Similarly, if I say that prices of production (the set of prices generating a uniform rate of profit) are the centres of gravitation for market prices, then again I'm something that's possibly true, possibly false, but substantive.
With your "market prices" it's not so clear: if you mean, prices of production adjusted for specific differential indirect taxation, specific persistent monopoly power, specific barriers to entry, and so on, then you could be saying something substantive. But if you really just mean space- and time-averages of actual prices then the claim that these are "centres of gravitation" is just an arithmetical truism: on average, prices are at their averages! (Although actually it's not quite that easy, because then it's incumbent upon you to spell out the scope and form of the "averaging": prices averaged how, over what time-interval and what spatial domain? Otherwise it's just hand-waving.)
Allin Cottrell
- Re: [OPE-L] "Build it Now" - An Interview with Michael A Lebowitz, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] "Build it Now" - An Interview with Michael A Lebowitz, Jerry Levy Thu 01 Mar 2007, 13:32 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, Rakesh Bhandari Thu 01 Mar 2007, 03:46 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, Paul Cockshott Thu 01 Mar 2007, 13:43 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, Pen-L Fred Moseley Thu 01 Mar 2007, 04:14 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, Allin Cottrell Fri 02 Mar 2007, 03:52 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, Diego Guerrero Mon 05 Mar 2007, 18:36 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, Diego Guerrero Mon 05 Mar 2007, 14:12 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, Pen-L Fred Moseley Fri 09 Mar 2007, 14:02 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, Jerry Levy Thu 01 Mar 2007, 14:58 GMT