IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Hi Ian. A brief interjection. > If labour values in principle require knowledge of price magnitudes > for their calculation then labour values cannot explain prices. It is > like saying that a thermometer measures temperature but temperature > depends on the current reading of the thermometer. Following Marx, if exchange-value is a necessary form of appearance of value and if money is a necessary form of appearance of exchange-value, then the problem you are posing vanishes. I.e. commodity price is an _expression_ of value. This is quite different from the thermometer / temperature analogy: thermometers can measure heat but they are not expressions of heat. Nor are thermometers necessary for the existence of heat, whereas the value of commoditities requires an expression in price. In solidarity, Jerry
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, Ian Wright Fri 23 Feb 2007, 18:24 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, Diego Guerrero Sun 25 Feb 2007, 16:43 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, Ian Wright Tue 27 Feb 2007, 18:48 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, Rakesh Bhandari Tue 27 Feb 2007, 19:34 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, Jerry Levy Tue 27 Feb 2007, 20:07 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, Ian Wright Wed 28 Feb 2007, 17:39 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, ajit sinha Tue 27 Feb 2007, 21:01 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, Diego Guerrero Tue 27 Feb 2007, 21:22 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values, Ian Wright Wed 28 Feb 2007, 17:41 GMT