OPE-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

Re: [OPE-L] questions on the interpretation of labour values



You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.


Levels of abstraction? There are none. Suggest some.

On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 10:14 -0500, Jerry Levy wrote:
> > What do you propose then?
>
> Hi Diego:
>
> I propose that one begin by identifying and then ordering all
> of the levels of abstraction associated with the subject. This
> requires, as a prerequisite, that one has a clear idea of
> exactly what the subject is that you wish to explain.
>
> Then fill in that 'outline'  enough so that one is more clear
> which questions/issues are answered at each level of
> abstraction.
>
> Then, always being clear which level of abstraction you are
> dealing with, discuss the subject systematically from the
> most abstract to the most concrete necessary level of
> abstraction.  It might be possible (and, indeed, I think it is
> permissible) to have an order of exposition which
> doesn't follow quite the same order provided one has already
> worked out analytically all of the inter-connections. But,
> for purposes of dialogue, it is less confusing to proceed
> in the above order.
>
> In solidarity, Jerry



___________________________________________________________
Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail. "The New Version is radically easier to use" ? The Wall Street Journal
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]