IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
--- Jerry Levy <Gerald_A_Levy@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > So you have to come down > > from total to less total, you have to draw some > lines > > to frame your canvas, to delimit your subject > matter > > or the object of enquiry. <snip> > > > As far as I'm concerned, a short story model is > > good enough for me. > > Ajit: > > A "short story model" also requires that you frame > your > canvas and delimit your subject matter or object of > inquiry. While a short-story is desirable, where > possible, > it is possible to delineate the subject matter in > such a way > that the short story is _too_ short in order to > explain > essential aspects of a subject. You may ask: what > is > essential? Well, if the subject is capitalism, then > -- for > instance -- money is an essential aspect of that > subject. If > one has a theory of capitalism which could also be > used > to describe non-capitalist modes of production or > doesn't > have an adequate theory of money (and instead > substitutes the > fiction of numeraire) then one's story is too short. > Walrasian > theory, for instance, is "too short". _______________________ Jerry, it is obvious that you have not understood a word of what I have been saying. And since you have sniped most of what I had written, anybody who reads only this post would think that I must be an idiot. Neither I was denying that I don't have to frame my canvas nor proposing that people should write short stories or be brief in what they write. This whole response of yours is abosolutely ridiculous. By the way, how do you know that "Well, if the subject is capitalism, then-- for instance -- money is an essential aspect of that subject"? Does this essence of your subject dance around in the street or you have used some method of analysis to discover it? And if it is the latter, then what is that method that you used to find this essence out? Assertions are easy Jerry, but it does not take you too far. Cheers, ajit sinha __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
- Re: [OPE-L] re the 6 book plan, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] re the 6 book plan, Rakesh Bhandari Wed 13 Sep 2006, 01:48 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] re the 6 book plan, Jerry Levy Wed 13 Sep 2006, 11:46 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] re the 6 book plan, ajit sinha Wed 13 Sep 2006, 13:41 GMT
- [OPE-L] the long and the short of it, Jerry Levy Wed 13 Sep 2006, 15:12 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] the long and the short of it, ajit sinha Wed 13 Sep 2006, 19:48 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] the long and the short of it, Jerry Levy Thu 14 Sep 2006, 02:48 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] the long and the short of it, ajit sinha Thu 14 Sep 2006, 10:01 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] the long and the short of it, Jerry Levy Thu 14 Sep 2006, 13:24 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] the long and the short of it, ajit sinha Thu 14 Sep 2006, 18:45 GMT