IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
On Sun, 28 May 2006, Jurriaan Bendien wrote: > Fred also leaves out taxes, leases and royalties from his discussion of > surplus value. Logically Marx is committed to the idea that workers may > perform surplus labour without producing new surplus value. > I often wonder why Marxists almost never discuss taxation even when it > represents close to a third of gross value added. Jurriaan, you are right. Taxes is also another important part of the total surplus-value. I was talking about Marx's abstract theory in Volume 3 of the division of the total surplus-value into individual parts, which did not includes taxes. Thanks for your comment. Comradely, Fred
- Re: [OPE-L] monetary macro interpretation, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] monetary macro interpretation, Fred Moseley Sat 27 May 2006, 13:20 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] monetary macro interpretation, Rakesh Bhandari Sat 27 May 2006, 15:10 GMT
- [OPE-L] monetary macro interpretation, Jurriaan Bendien Sun 28 May 2006, 11:31 GMT
- [OPE-L] caste and class in Tirupur, Rakesh Bhandari Sun 28 May 2006, 16:08 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] monetary macro interpretation, Fred Moseley Sun 28 May 2006, 20:56 GMT
- [OPE-L] monetary macro interpretation, Jurriaan Bendien Wed 31 May 2006, 17:10 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] monetary macro interpretation, Ian Wright Wed 31 May 2006, 18:27 GMT
- [OPE-L] Maximilien Rubel website, glevy Thu 18 May 2006, 23:58 GMT
- [OPE-L] Conference (2007): Alasdair MacIntyre's Revolutionary Aristotelianism, Jerry Levy Thu 18 May 2006, 13:01 GMT