OPE-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

Re: [OPE-L] monetary macro interpretation



You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.


On Sun, 28 May 2006, Jurriaan Bendien wrote:

> Fred also leaves out taxes, leases and royalties from his discussion of
> surplus value. Logically Marx is committed to the idea that workers may
> perform surplus labour without producing new surplus value.
> I often wonder why Marxists almost never discuss taxation even when it
> represents close to a third of gross value added.


Jurriaan, you are right.  Taxes is also another important part
of the total surplus-value.  I was talking about Marx's abstract
theory in Volume 3 of the division of the total surplus-value into
individual parts, which did not includes taxes.

Thanks for your comment.

Comradely,
Fred



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]