IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
On Sat, 27 May 2006, Jerry Levy wrote: > Fred, > > In the following you assert that "each and every worker produces > surplus-value" and that the "average worker" (which "represents > all workers together") produces surplus-value. This is a very odd > formulation -- especially from you -- since it assumes that all labor > performed by workers is productive of surplus-value (i.e. productive > labor as a proportion of the total labor equals 100%; unproductive labor > as a proportion of the total labor performed by wage-workers equals 0%). > Yet, in some of your published writings you emphasize the importance, > and the growing importance, of unproductive labor in relation to the > process of capitalist accumulation. Ce' pasa? > > In solidarity, Jerry Jerry, I obviously meant to say all productive workers. This is a separate issue from the aggregate / individual issue that Rakesh and I are discussing. Thanks for your correction. Comradely, Fred
- Re: [OPE-L] monetary macro interpretation, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] monetary macro interpretation, Fred Moseley Sat 27 May 2006, 13:18 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] monetary macro interpretation, Jerry Levy Sat 27 May 2006, 14:08 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] monetary macro interpretation, Rakesh Bhandari Sat 27 May 2006, 15:22 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] monetary macro interpretation, Jerry Levy Sat 27 May 2006, 15:33 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] monetary macro interpretation, Fred Moseley Sun 28 May 2006, 20:52 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] monetary macro interpretation, Rakesh Bhandari Sat 27 May 2006, 15:07 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] monetary macro interpretation, Fred Moseley Sun 28 May 2006, 20:50 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] monetary macro interpretation, Rakesh Bhandari Thu 25 May 2006, 22:56 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] monetary macro interpretation, Fred Moseley Sat 27 May 2006, 13:20 GMT