IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
> Marx argues that the workers give free credit to the capitalist!
Hi Chai-on,
Good point, but _within Marx's period analysis_ there must be M
advanced
for MP and LP _before_ there can be production. To the extent, _in
practice_, that wage-workers make an 'advance' to capitalists then it
takes
the form of labor activity not money.
> If a capitalist starts his business with borrowed money, does he
> advance nothing at all?
I'm not sure I understand the question. Even with borrowed
money,
capitalists must still as a condition for production in the next period
(within the formula C - M {MP; LP} ... (P) ... C' - M') advance
(the borrowed) money.
In solidarity, Jerry
|
- [OPE-L] An Engine, Not a Camera How Financial Models Shape Markets Donald MacKenzie, Rakesh Bhandari Tue 16 May 2006, 07:29 GMT
- [OPE-L] PUPL and the total profit/total surplus value identity, Jurriaan Bendien Mon 15 May 2006, 22:32 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] PUPL and the total profit/total surplus value identity, Jerry Levy Tue 16 May 2006, 20:21 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] PUPL and the total profit/total surplus value identity, ope-admin Wed 17 May 2006, 03:18 GMT
- [OPE-L] 'advancing' money, Jerry Levy Wed 17 May 2006, 13:58 GMT
- [OPE-L] PUPL and the total profit/total surplus value identity, Jurriaan Bendien Wed 17 May 2006, 17:03 GMT
- [OPE-L] PUPL and the total profit/total surplus value identity, Jurriaan Bendien Mon 22 May 2006, 20:30 GMT
- [OPE-L] Leontief Prize Announcement, glevy Mon 15 May 2006, 20:38 GMT
- [OPE-L] Capital finally has a solution for Global Warming!, glevy Mon 15 May 2006, 20:34 GMT