IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Hi again Alejandro,
What did you think of his reply (abstract below) printed in the same
issue of the _CJE_? Clear as water?
In solidarity, Jerry
Reply to Cockshott and Cottrell
Andrew J. Kliman
Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2005, vol. 29, issue 2, pages
317-323
Abstract: This note reaffirms the author's conclusion that
measured price--value correlations have been tainted by the
influence of industry size and are therefore spurious.
'Deflation' of sectoral prices and values by costs destroys
the correlation only because the theory in question is false,
as the author's original paper proved deductively. Cockshott
and Cottrell's results do not refute this proof. Deflation
destroys the correlation between their simulated prices and
values precisely because their simulation model assumes that
the theory is false.
- [OPE-L] The Precarity Map, glevy Thu 04 May 2006, 12:27 GMT
- [OPE-L] Robust correlations between prices and labour values, Alejandro Valle Baeza Wed 03 May 2006, 04:26 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Robust correlations between prices and labour values, Jerry Levy Wed 03 May 2006, 13:32 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Robust correlations between prices and labour values, Alejandro Valle Baeza Fri 05 May 2006, 00:13 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] Robust correlations between prices and labour values, glevy Wed 03 May 2006, 13:52 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Robust correlations between prices and labour values, Alejandro Valle Baeza Fri 05 May 2006, 00:16 GMT
- [OPE-L] Robust correlations between prices and labour values, Jurriaan Bendien Fri 05 May 2006, 11:33 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Robust correlations between prices and labour values, Philip Dunn Fri 05 May 2006, 12:13 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Robust correlations between prices and labour values, clyder Fri 12 May 2006, 21:06 GMT