IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
> Back to my not-so-whimsical question--- do we need more > abstract theory or more attempts at persuading and developing a new > common sense these days? Hi Mike L, It shouldn't be an 'either - or' type of question. The question should be how the two can best be integrated. Easily said, of course, .... In solidarity, Jerry PS: beware cherries that are picked from a poisoned field.
- [OPE-L] Fwd: [PEN-L] an ad hominem response, (continued)
- [OPE-L] Fwd: [PEN-L] an ad hominem response, Hans G. Ehrbar Sat 15 Apr 2006, 15:56 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Fwd: [PEN-L] an ad hominem response, michael a. lebowitz Sat 15 Apr 2006, 20:06 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] an ad hominem response, glevy Sun 16 Apr 2006, 15:21 GMT
- Message not available
- Re: [OPE-L] an ad hominem response, michael a. lebowitz Sun 16 Apr 2006, 18:49 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] an ad hominem response, glevy Sun 16 Apr 2006, 19:26 GMT
- Message not available
- Re: [OPE-L] an ad hominem response, Anders Ekeland Mon 17 Apr 2006, 14:29 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] an ad hominem response, michael a. lebowitz Mon 17 Apr 2006, 19:25 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] perfect competition, glevy Mon 17 Apr 2006, 23:49 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] an ad hominem response, Rakesh Bhandari Tue 18 Apr 2006, 03:15 GMT