IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Hi Jerry,
No, I definitely meant 'ad hominem' in the sense of
persuasion (and not rhetoric in the sense of contemporary lists on
marxism). That said, on one list which I follow--despite the vast
amount of noise, there are real gems which I cherry-pick from the archive.
Back to my not-so-whimsical question--- do we need more
abstract theory or more attempts at persuading and developing a new
common sense these days?
in solidarity,
michael> ps. do we need more logic or more ad hominem arguments these days?
Mike L,
Revolutionary change is not brought about by logic alone.
But, if it's ad hominem arguments that you want (in the _contemporary_ meaning of the expression) then you have no further need to look beyond other Internet lists devoted to the discussion of 'marxism'. (We don't need to mention names here, do we?) It is unclear to me, though, why _anyone_ would be attracted to marxism after viewing those discussions. Indeed, I suspect that quite the reverse occurs.
In solidarity, Jerry
Michael A. Lebowitz Professor Emeritus Economics Department Simon Fraser University Burnaby, B.C., Canada V5A 1S6
Currently based in Venezuela. Can be reached at Residencias Anauco Suites Departamento 601 Parque Central, Zona Postal 1010, Oficina 1 Caracas, Venezuela (58-212) 573-4111 fax: (58-212) 573-7724
- Re: [OPE-L] an ad hominem response, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] an ad hominem response, glevy Sat 15 Apr 2006, 16:16 GMT
- [OPE-L] Fwd: [PEN-L] an ad hominem response, Hans G. Ehrbar Sat 15 Apr 2006, 15:56 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Fwd: [PEN-L] an ad hominem response, michael a. lebowitz Sat 15 Apr 2006, 20:06 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] an ad hominem response, glevy Sun 16 Apr 2006, 15:21 GMT
- Message not available
- Re: [OPE-L] an ad hominem response, michael a. lebowitz Sun 16 Apr 2006, 18:49 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] an ad hominem response, glevy Sun 16 Apr 2006, 19:26 GMT
- Message not available
- Re: [OPE-L] an ad hominem response, Anders Ekeland Mon 17 Apr 2006, 14:29 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] an ad hominem response, michael a. lebowitz Mon 17 Apr 2006, 19:25 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] perfect competition, glevy Mon 17 Apr 2006, 23:49 GMT