IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
> ps. do we need more logic or more ad hominem arguments these days? Mike L, Revolutionary change is not brought about by logic alone. But, if it's ad hominem arguments that you want (in the _contemporary_ meaning of the expression) then you have no further need to look beyond other Internet lists devoted to the discussion of 'marxism'. (We don't need to mention names here, do we?) It is unclear to me, though, why _anyone_ would be attracted to marxism after viewing those discussions. Indeed, I suspect that quite the reverse occurs. In solidarity, Jerry
- Re: [OPE-L] Fwd: [PEN-L] an ad hominem response, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Fwd: [PEN-L] an ad hominem response, Christopher Arthur Sat 15 Apr 2006, 15:20 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] an ad hominem response, glevy Sat 15 Apr 2006, 16:16 GMT
- [OPE-L] Fwd: [PEN-L] an ad hominem response, Hans G. Ehrbar Sat 15 Apr 2006, 15:56 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Fwd: [PEN-L] an ad hominem response, michael a. lebowitz Sat 15 Apr 2006, 20:06 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] an ad hominem response, glevy Sun 16 Apr 2006, 15:21 GMT
- Message not available
- Re: [OPE-L] an ad hominem response, michael a. lebowitz Sun 16 Apr 2006, 18:49 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] an ad hominem response, glevy Sun 16 Apr 2006, 19:26 GMT
- Message not available
- Re: [OPE-L] an ad hominem response, Anders Ekeland Mon 17 Apr 2006, 14:29 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] an ad hominem response, michael a. lebowitz Mon 17 Apr 2006, 19:25 GMT