IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
Hi Paul
C,
> To answer with
another question:
>
How many years would it
take at the current rate of deficit
>
for the entire fixed
capital stock of the
>
hands of overseas
investors?
I assume you mean 'at
the current rate of change'?
> Would this point
not act as a limit?
Why?
The issue isn't how
long it would take for the fixed capital
stock to become fully
owned abroad. The issue is, if you
are projecting a crash
in the long-run, how long is the
long-run?
Also, I don't see any
reason to necessarily believe that
foreign ownership
of the fixed capital stock in the US would
cause a crash in the
US. Indeed, a contrary argument could
made: if the fixed
capital stock becomes fully owned by
investors abroad, then
those investors have an increased
incentive to prop up
the US economy -- they have more to
lose by a
collapse. If firms based out of the US declare
bankruptcy in a crash
that can't be good for their foreign
investors.
In solidarity,
Jerry
|
- [OPE-L] Capital Income Balance (RE: [OPE-L] Trade Deficit Disorder), Kitamura Iwao Tue 21 Mar 2006, 23:19 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Capital Income Balance, Jerry Levy Tue 21 Mar 2006, 23:58 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Capital Income Balance, Kitamura Iwao Wed 22 Mar 2006, 21:27 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Crashes, adjustment, and the long-run, Paul Cockshott Tue 21 Mar 2006, 09:01 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Crashes, adjustment, and the long-run, Jerry Levy Tue 21 Mar 2006, 13:13 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] Crashes, adjustment, and the long-run, Paul Cockshott Tue 21 Mar 2006, 16:38 GMT
- [OPE-L] Crashes, adjustment, and the long-run, Jurriaan Bendien Wed 22 Mar 2006, 23:03 GMT
- [OPE-L] Deutscher Prize - Nominations, Asfilho Mon 20 Mar 2006, 10:12 GMT
- [OPE-L] THE LEFT AFTER MAY 1968 AND THE LONGING FOR TOTAL REVOLUTION Luc Boltanski, Rakesh Bhandari Sun 19 Mar 2006, 08:28 GMT