OPE-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy
requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
Re: [OPE-L] Trade Deficit Disorder
You may cite this message only if you
do not disclose who wrote it.
Title: Re: [OPE-L] Trade Deficit
Disorder
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rakesh Bhandari" <bhandari@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
The CAD may be a bigger problem for US's
creditors than it is
for the US! As Susan Strange long ago pointed out in Mad
Money
(1998): the US can use "its bargaining power as military
protector, or as
interventionist meddler, or as major trading partner to get its own
way
and to
make others undergo the painful adjustments."
Is there merit to re-examining the 1970s when the US transferred
its
wreckage of the Bretton Woods currency system to Europe via
exported
inflation, a lower dollar, the gold price explosion (and the $80 bn
US
default on the $35/oz commitment) - before Volcker's 1979 shock? (And
that
shock of course kicked off the Third World debt crisis and serious
austerity
across the world.)
Yes, Patrick, I agree with you that this history is
relevant. I posted the following
six years ago. Whether the US can count on foreign cooperation in
supporting
the international role of the dollar is of course an open
question. The ending
of the cold war and the emergence of the euro do make the present
quite different...
I heard Fred Bergsten joke a decade ago that the collapse
of the Soviet Union would
eventually be the greatest shot in the arm to Lenin's theory of
open and brutal
inter imperial rivalry.
The Ricardo Hausman mentioned in the WSJ article cowrote work
with Alain Lipietz, no?
comradely, rb
there is an
interesting discussion of this
problem in Robert
Gilpin's The Challenge of Global Capitalism: The World
Economy in the 21st century (Princeton, 2000). Here is some of it:
"The intl role of the dollar has conferred a nubmer of concrete
economic
and political benefits on the US that it would forfeit if the dollar
were
to lose its status as the world's key currency. The intl demand for
dollars
has meant that the US has been able to finance its huge and
continuing
trade/payments deficit since the early 1980s at a minimal cost. IN
effect,
the US govt has been able to assume that other countries would
automatically finance the huge American intl payments deficit
because
others, needing dollars to conduct their intl business, did not demand
high
interest rates. Moreover, the US has been able to borrow in its
own
currency and thus avoid exchange rate risks [that also allows for the
US to
inflate away its debt, and the devaluation of the dollar did indeed
reduce
the debt owed by the US while simultaneously imposing heavy costs
on
Japanese and other lenders in the 1990s]. Most of the dollars in
circulation are overseas in the hands of non Americans; this so
called
'dollar overhang' of about $265 bn is the equivalent of an interest
free
loan to the US extimated to be worth about $13 bn in saved
interest
payments."
Writing about loss of confidence in the dollars in the late 60s
onward,
Gilpin notes:
"America's cold war allies, fearing that a collapse of the dollar
would
force the US to withdraw its forces from overseas and to retreat
into
political isolation, agreed to hold overvalued dollars. ALso such
export
oriented economies as W Germany and, at a later date, Japan wished to
keep
access to the lucrative American market.
"Throughout the postwar era the US always had one primary partner
helping
it to defend the dollar and hence the US intl position. In the
early
postwar period, the American position and support for the dollar were
based
on cooperation with the British; this 'special relationship' begun
between
the First and Second World Wars, had been solidified by wartime
experience.
The Anglo Saxon worked together to frame the Bretton Woods System
and
reestablish the liberal intl economy. By the late 1960s, however,
the
relative decline of the British economy forced Great Britain to pull
away
from its close partnership with the US
"W Germany then replaced G Bri as the formost economic partner of
the US
and as the mamor supporter of the dollar. Throughout the Vietnam War
and
into the 1970s, the Germans supported American hegemony by holding
dollars
and buying
American govt securities. Inflationary and other consequences of
this new special relationship weakend it in the mid 1970s and
eventually
led to a fracture in the late 1970s when the Germans refused to
support
President Carter's economic policies; the Germans then joined the
French to
sponsor the European Monetary System. Creation of this 'zone of
stability'
in W Europe was the first of many efforts to isolate the European
economies
from the wild fluctuations of the dollar.
"In the 1980s the Germans were replaced by the Japanese when,
through their
investments in the US, the Japanese provided financial backing for
Reagan's
economic and military policies. In the 1990s, sporadic informal
cooperation
among American, German, and Japanese central banks supported the intl
role
of the dollar. This cooperation continued largely due to fear of what
would
happen to the intl economic and political system if the monetary
system
were to break down."
see pp. 60-1,
120-21, 222-225
- Thread context:
- Re: [OPE-L] Crashes, adjustment, and the long-run, (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]