IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
>From the Critical-Realism mailing list. I have cleaned-up Harvey's post by correcting a few typos. / In solidarity, Jerry ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: Bhaskar message, Re [Critical-Realism] Historical Materialism -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Mervyn Hartwig wrote: >> Hi Ismail >> Bhaskar's view, which I share, is that the mature Marx is a scientific >> realist and (dialectical) critical naturalist in the CR sense; i.e.the >> philosophy implicitly informing his work is basically similar to CR. >> (This doesn't mean that it isn't also consistent with other research >> programmes). >> So all you have to do is figure out the basic CR positions on persons, >> society, geo-history, etc. and you have the specific homologies. >> Plus figure out which ones show a direct influence - e.g. the >> conception of society as an ensemble of social relations comes from >> Marx. Bhaskar assesses and critiques Marx in some detail in DPF. >> Hope this helps. >> Mervyn >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "i.lagardien-alumni" <snip, JL> >> Hi Everyone >> Can someone identify, or clarify specific homologies between Critical >> Realism and Historical Materialism, please. >> Ismail <snip, JL> As a Critical Marxist, I can only second Mervyn's evaluation of Marx and Critical Realism. I have found Bhaskar's work immensely helpful in framing my sociological analysis. His TMSA is especially useful in that it demands a material concreteness that dialectical sense that often disciplines my research. I would venture a guess--and elict comment as well--that Bhaskar's work performs ahomologous function similar to that played by the triad of Wittgenstein/Sraffa/ Gramsci in the thirties and forties in reframing Marxist thought. Lastly, and most germane from a purely professional promotion perspective, Bhaskar, along with Talcott Parsons and Pierre Bourdieu, also serves as a valuable scapegoat when I screw up my analysis.
- Re: [OPE-L] price of production/supply price/value, ope-admin Mon 06 Mar 2006, 19:35 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] price of production/supply price/value, Ian Wright Tue 07 Mar 2006, 23:24 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] price of production/supply price/value, Paul Cockshott Wed 08 Mar 2006, 09:53 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] price of production/supply price/value, Fred Moseley Sun 12 Mar 2006, 15:57 GMT
- [OPE-L] David Harvey on Critical Realism, glevy Mon 06 Mar 2006, 14:33 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] David Harvey on Critical Realism, Howard Engelskirchen Mon 06 Mar 2006, 15:45 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] David Harvey on Critical Realism, Jerry Levy Mon 06 Mar 2006, 16:18 GMT
- [OPE-L] Martin Legassick on Depelchin's Silences in African History, Rakesh Bhandari Mon 06 Mar 2006, 03:55 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Martin Legassick on Depelchin's Silences in African History, Patrick Bond Tue 07 Mar 2006, 11:53 GMT