IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
My answer here, Howard, is that I can't think of a "social structure," as I said above, that is (in your words) "mind independent.
Side comment:
Surely the point is that the social structure exists, not without minds, but rather regardless of what individual people may think, i.e. they are necessarily related in certain ways, regardless of what they may individually happen to think about it, or even regardless of how they may act.
In my wikipedia contribution to the article "social relation" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_relation ) I distinguish the following typology of social relations:
a.. the subconscious social relations (for example at the level of the collective unconscious or between parents and children, b.. social relations which exist only in subjective awareness or subjective perceptions (a person might act as though a social relation exists), c.. intersubjective social relations involving shared meanings conveyed through communication, d.. objective social relations which exist whether someone is aware of them or not (they might nevertheless be communicated insofar as we communicate with everything we are and do); e.. social relations in the process of being transformed from one kind into another, or being interrelated with each other; f.. spiritual or intuitive social relations of some kind.
A social "structure" in this case refers to a relatively stable (reproducible) complex of objective social relations, which may be directly observable, or observable indirectly through the empirical effects it has. Precisely because it exists independently of what any particular individual thinks, the real nature of this structure may be accurately or falsely interpreted, and to reveal this real nature may require scientific research, or at least comprehensive experience of the social world.
Jurriaan
- [OPE-L] the "unequal exchange" controversy, (continued)
- [OPE-L] the "unequal exchange" controversy, Jurriaan Bendien Thu 29 Dec 2005, 19:09 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] the "unequal exchange" controversy, Jerry Levy Fri 30 Dec 2005, 07:27 GMT
- [OPE-L] the "unequal exchange" controversy, Jurriaan Bendien Fri 30 Dec 2005, 19:42 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] the "unequal exchange" controversy, Jerry Levy Sat 31 Dec 2005, 13:06 GMT
- [OPE-L] Overdetermination, Jurriaan Bendien Tue 27 Dec 2005, 00:28 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Overdetermination, antonio callari Tue 27 Dec 2005, 14:37 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Overdetermination, Howard Engelskirchen Fri 30 Dec 2005, 07:27 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Overdetermination, Howard Engelskirchen Sat 31 Dec 2005, 07:14 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Absolutes in Marxian Theory?, Jerry Levy Sat 31 Dec 2005, 14:12 GMT