IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Paul,
What you are doing is decomposing the rate of profit (and
there could be other variations-- eg., taking into account turnover
insofar as the appropriate rate of surplus value is the annual one),
but is that the same as identifying causes?
michael
At 14:54 16/12/2005, Paul C wrote:
Mike wrote: This is a great opportunity for a systems-illiterate person like me to get an answer from a specialist. Assume that we have what Marx called a 'structure of society, in which all relations coexist simultaneously and support one another.' If you have a system with substantial interaction, feedback, etc (eg. change in X produces change in Y which produces change in Z which produces change in A which produces major change in Y), then how can we reason from the quantitative results of change to the weight to be assigned to causes? The unambiguous results you suggest would certainly be true if we assume no interaction effects (ie., that we can assign weights to factor A and to factor B but the value of AB approaches zero), but then the conclusion is embodied in the assumption.
------------- I cited that example because it ( with slight changes to the figures ) came out of a conjectural analysis of the UK that Allin and I did back in 1976. The interaction effects here are negligible because Marxist economics gives us clear formulae for the rate of profit as a function of the other variables. One can take the partial derivative of the rate of profit with respect to them along with the known data on the change in each of the individual variables and determine from this how much the change in c/v, s/v and p/s would, taken by themselves have produced as a change in the rate of profit.
The point is that the whole formula captures the interaction between them, and since it is an analytic formula, you can compute its derivatives.
On the other hand, how can we come to a weighting of causes from the empirical results? in solidarity, michael Michael A. Lebowitz Professor Emeritus Economics Department Simon Fraser University Burnaby, B.C., Canada V5A 1S6
Currently based in Venezuela. Can be reached at Residencias Anauco Suites Departamento 601 Parque Central, Zona Postal 1010, Oficina 1 Caracas, Venezuela (58-212) 573-4111 fax: (58-212) 573-7724
Michael A. Lebowitz Professor Emeritus Economics Department Simon Fraser University Burnaby, B.C., Canada V5A 1S6
Currently based in Venezuela. Can be reached at Residencias Anauco Suites Departamento 601 Parque Central, Zona Postal 1010, Oficina 1 Caracas, Venezuela (58-212) 573-4111 fax: (58-212) 573-7724
- [OPE-L] Dept. of Homeland Security investigates college student for ... !, glevy Mon 19 Dec 2005, 02:20 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Dept. of Homeland Security investigates college student for ... !, Ian Hunt Mon 19 Dec 2005, 05:07 GMT
- [OPE-L] Marxism Symposium 2006, Jerry Levy Mon 19 Dec 2005, 02:07 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] measuring causes, Paul Cockshott Fri 16 Dec 2005, 18:53 GMT
- Message not available
- Re: [OPE-L] measuring causes, michael a. lebowitz Sun 18 Dec 2005, 07:30 GMT
- [OPE-L] resnick and wolff on the commodity form, Howard Engelskirchen Mon 19 Dec 2005, 05:39 GMT
- [OPE-L] resnick and wolff on the commodity form, Hans G. Ehrbar Mon 19 Dec 2005, 18:44 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] resnick and wolff on the commodity form, Stephen Cullenberg Mon 19 Dec 2005, 22:59 GMT
- [OPE-L] resnick and wolff on the commodity form, Hans G. Ehrbar Tue 20 Dec 2005, 03:57 GMT