IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Hi Jerry, My impression is a casual one and comes from conference conversation, so I'll punt. If there are folks doing such work who do take a position on the issue, I'd be interested in hearing a discussion of it. Thanks, Howard ----- Original Message ----- From: <glevy@xxxxxxxxx> To: <OPE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 7:39 PM Subject: Re: [OPE-L] the concept of verticality in value-form theories > > Actually, I have the impression that important strains of Value Form > > Theory also reject the concept of verticality. Am I wrong on this? > > Hi Howard: > > Which important strains of value-form theory are you referring to? > > In solidarity, Jerry >
- [OPE-L] measuring causes, (continued)
- [OPE-L] measuring causes, michael a. lebowitz Fri 16 Dec 2005, 13:32 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] David F. Ruccio, (Un)Real Criticism, Post-Autistic Economics Review, issue 35, Howard Engelskirchen Tue 13 Dec 2005, 23:42 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] David F. Ruccio, (Un)Real Criticism, Post-Autistic Economics Review, issue 35, Howard Engelskirchen Wed 14 Dec 2005, 00:11 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] the concept of verticality in value-form theories, glevy Wed 14 Dec 2005, 00:40 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] the concept of verticality in value-form theories, Howard Engelskirchen Wed 14 Dec 2005, 03:51 GMT
- [OPE-L] A class dimension of aggregate demand, Jurriaan Bendien Mon 05 Dec 2005, 21:08 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] A class dimension of aggregate demand, Jerry Levy Tue 06 Dec 2005, 13:44 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [OPE-L] A class dimension of aggregate demand, Jurriaan Bendien Tue 06 Dec 2005, 17:17 GMT
- [OPE-L] A class dimension of aggregate demand, Jurriaan Bendien Wed 07 Dec 2005, 17:28 GMT