IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
> Actually, I have the impression that important strains of Value Form > Theory also reject the concept of verticality. Am I wrong on this? Hi Howard: Which important strains of value-form theory are you referring to? In solidarity, Jerry
- Re: [OPE-L] the rate of interest, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] the rate of interest, Jerry Levy Thu 15 Dec 2005, 15:43 GMT
- [OPE-L] measuring causes, michael a. lebowitz Fri 16 Dec 2005, 13:32 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] David F. Ruccio, (Un)Real Criticism, Post-Autistic Economics Review, issue 35, Howard Engelskirchen Tue 13 Dec 2005, 23:42 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] David F. Ruccio, (Un)Real Criticism, Post-Autistic Economics Review, issue 35, Howard Engelskirchen Wed 14 Dec 2005, 00:11 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] the concept of verticality in value-form theories, glevy Wed 14 Dec 2005, 00:40 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] the concept of verticality in value-form theories, Howard Engelskirchen Wed 14 Dec 2005, 03:51 GMT
- [OPE-L] A class dimension of aggregate demand, Jurriaan Bendien Mon 05 Dec 2005, 21:08 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] A class dimension of aggregate demand, Jerry Levy Tue 06 Dec 2005, 13:44 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [OPE-L] A class dimension of aggregate demand, Jurriaan Bendien Tue 06 Dec 2005, 17:17 GMT