IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Jerry, Let me take this opportunity to state that I am a classical liberal with respect to the clash of ideas. I take a Popperian view that it is advantageous to have a multitude of competing ideas that are freely and fairly discussed. I am using "anti-Marxist" and "anti-science" in an attempt at scholary accuracy; nothing more, nothing less. I will be interested in arguments against my characterization of the text. I am not interested in arguments that such labels should not be used in scientific discourse, for whatever reason. I will say what I think. It is a matter of fact whether or not the text is "anti-Marxist". Rational individuals should be able to debate, and iterate towards agreement on this matter of fact. I am more than prepared to change my mind, in the light of counter-arguments. Best wishes, -Ian.
- Re: [OPE-L] Theories and Practices, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Theories and Practices, Ian Wright Wed 07 Dec 2005, 18:07 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Scare Quotes (note 'Scare Quotes'), Jerry Levy Thu 08 Dec 2005, 14:01 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Scare Quotes (note 'Scare Quotes'), Paul Cockshott Thu 08 Dec 2005, 14:51 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Scare Quotes (note 'Scare Quotes'), Jerry Levy Thu 08 Dec 2005, 15:26 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Scare Quotes (note 'Scare Quotes'), Ian Wright Thu 08 Dec 2005, 20:24 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Theories and Practices, Paul Bullock Thu 08 Dec 2005, 14:46 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] David F. Ruccio, (Un)Real Criticism, Post-Autistic Economics Review, issue 35, Howard Engelskirchen Wed 07 Dec 2005, 06:53 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] David F. Ruccio, (Un)Real Criticism, Post-Autistic Economics Review, issue 35, Howard Engelskirchen Tue 13 Dec 2005, 23:34 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] David F. Ruccio, (Un)Real Criticism, Post-Autistic Economics Review, issue 35, Paul Cockshott Thu 15 Dec 2005, 12:53 GMT