IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Maybe Jim Craven's manifesto is well-intentioned, but politically speaking it's unlikely to get many people on board, I would say. The way I learnt about politics, is that you have to build some kind of bridge from where people are really at, to where you want them to go. The way it reads, is that neoclassical economists are a pack of morons, it's a sort of declaration of war, so then effectively he wants people to sign up to saying they're a pack of morons. And not many academics would do it, because in real life they have to dialogue every day with people who think differently from the way they do, and it's by no means clear that all neoclassical economics is nonsense anyway (at least I don't think so, whatever my criticisms). A manifesto is stronger, if it has a positive message about something, i.e. we positively believe this, our concerns are such-and-such, if you share this view, why not join us. So, as for myself, I would not sign it (well, I am not a professional economist anyway).
Jurriaan
- [OPE-L] _We are all terrorists now!_, (continued)
- [OPE-L] _We are all terrorists now!_, Jerry Levy Fri 02 Dec 2005, 14:05 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] heterodoxy, Jerry Levy Thu 01 Dec 2005, 13:30 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] heterodoxy, glevy Thu 01 Dec 2005, 13:32 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] heterodoxy, glevy Thu 01 Dec 2005, 13:38 GMT
- [OPE-L] Heterodoxy, Jurriaan Bendien Fri 02 Dec 2005, 16:38 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] heterodoxy, glevy Sat 03 Dec 2005, 14:06 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] abstraction and surprise, Andrew Brown Thu 01 Dec 2005, 11:19 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] abstraction and surprise, Howard Engelskirchen Thu 01 Dec 2005, 15:46 GMT
- [OPE-L] Concepts and Starting Points, Jerry Levy Fri 02 Dec 2005, 14:04 GMT