Re: [OPE-L] "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?" [WTC 1, 2, and 7]

[Philip Dunn <hyl0morph@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Paul

Yes, a very thorough paper.  It is all over the blogosphere but does not
look like achieving crossover to the mainstream media. There is nothing
about it over here.  Not surprising when the Guardian takes it on itself
to smear Noam Chomsky.
(http://www.iraqwar.mirror-world.ru/article/71298)

Phil


On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 23:05 -0500, Paul Zarembka wrote:
> Addressing questions the 9-11 Commission didn't ask and suggestive of a surprising answer is a study by Steven E. Jones, Professor of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University:
>
>    "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?"
>     http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
>
> Within the past week this work was first covered by a Utah newspaper:
>
>     "Y. professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC"
>      http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,635160132,00.html
>
> Last night, the study hit MSNBC -- see
>
>     "Questioning what happened on 9/11:
>      "Professor believes planes didn't cause all the damage around the WTC"
>      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10053445/#storyContinued
>
> I think this is important.  Paul Zarembka
>
> *************************************************************************
> RESEARCH IN POLITICAL ECONOMY,  Paul Zarembka,  editor,  Elsevier Science
> ********************** http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka



___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com