OPE-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]
Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

Re: [OPE-L] Raya Dunayevskaya Myths and Legends

You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it. 

--On Sunday, November 13, 2005 8:20 AM -0800 Rakesh Bhandari
<bhandari@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

... Now Paul Z says he did not notice a similarity
between HG and RD on Luxemburg. Well RD says
that Luxemburg did not understand the level
of abstraction of the reproduction schema and that
her underconsumptionism is nonsensical. These
are HG's two main criticisms. Why does Paul Z
not note a similarity? ...


Such two 'main' issues are commonly proffered criticism of Luxemburg.  You
don't need Grossman for either one.  Bukharin, in his own way, drew these
swords.  If one reads my article one can see why the distortions by
Dunayevskaya and Grossman, in my opinion, are distinct.

Paul


***********************************************************************
RESEARCH IN POLITICAL ECONOMY,  Paul Zarembka, editor, Elsevier Science
******************** http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka

[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]