OPE-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy
requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
Re: [OPE-L] Fw: W J Blake clarification requested
You may cite this message only if you
do not disclose who wrote it.
Title: Re: [OPE-L] Fw: W J Blake clarification
requested
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Bullock
To: rakeshb@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005
6:04 PM
Subject: W J Blake clarification
requested
Dear
Rakesh,
In late 2003
you kindly sent me this attached note, saying Blake was a
journalist. I was a bit confused reading this since this is
not what it said/says in his books introduction. Are we talking at
cross purposes. I referred to William J Blake who in 1939 published
the 'Elements..' used in the email title. But he was a stock exchange
'worker'(!) and banker, not as you say in the email a journalist!
I don't understand how he could have lived in poverty later.
Is there some error on your part or are we talking about
different Blakes??
same Blake and Blech. He emigrated from the US after the War and
lived in poverty in England. As Jerry noted, he was a journalist in
the 1920s
You say you
have 2 MSS from a 'Blake'... is it not possible to publish
these ?
I have a sinking feeling that somehow these two MSS as well
as Shoul's Radcliffe dissertation have been lost in my move; they have
not yet surfaced. By the way, thanks again to Jerry for having told me
about Shoul's dissertation.
I also have this suspicion that Raya Duyanevskaya (a pseudonym I
have been told) was Shoul's nom de guerre. But I have no way of
proving it.
What strikes
me is that some of the best material is literally unavailable to
english readers.. eg probably the MSS you refer to, especially
if one is on Imperialism...!!!!
It's not a great book (as Elements of Marxian Economic
Theory...An American Looks...); quite rambling, not
theoretically tight and not innovative. But massively learned.
And... he is often
quite eloquent. From William J. Blake in an unpublished mss
Imperialism from 1948 (I have quoted this passage at least three times
before).
One cannot
abstract from the history of capitalism its constant wars,
either at home or in the colonies, its armaments, its large
military
establishments, its struggles for plunders, its terrible human and
material costs, and then assert that such things, enormous as they
are, are excrescencies. The idea of abstraction is dear to
these
economists, but it is not an act of legitimate abstraction.
They
choose to assume
that an ideal system of production and exchange goes on: that this
system operates without political consequences, that it can thus be
viewed as having a normal existence independent of its action in most
countries, in a large part of the course of economic history.
Now, abstraction is legitimate as a weapon of exploration. One can go
beneath the great indicative appearance of capitalism and
seek to isolate its law of wages, prices, interest, rent, profit,
etc. But from that to refusing to consider the costs of its
actual
working out, when making a specific analysis, there is no
relationship at all. The persistent tendencies of any system
culminate in its political manifestations, and wars and
destruction
are no more to be reckoned out of the costs of capitalism than its
payments for machinery. The system of supply and demand does not
achieve economic harmony such that it avoids crises and wars.
These
inflect its course. It is a masquerade of inflation,
bankruptcy,
boom and bust, fraud, unemployment, race hatred, colonial
oppression,
war, devastation, reconstruction. This Satanic medley is what it
is:
there is no pure system operating outside of all these
consequences and which would prevail, a Platonic ideal, were it
not
disturbed by these recurrent miseries and shame, apparently
arising
out of another
world?"
If I reread the
mss I may change my mind about its importance. Especially valuable may
be the critique of theories of possibility of international
cooperation.
and
Grossmans full book and several of his articles. Would it not be a
great service to do something on Blake as an intro to publishing his
MSS? ( like the service Rick is trying to render to
Grossman?)
I have forgotten so much I once knew about his life. I
communicated to Rick Kuhn that one of Stead's short stories is
actually about the many lives of Henryk Grossmann, a good friend of
William J. Blake's. And to truly write about Blake one would have to
have read his novels.
I look
forward to your clarification... .
Steve Palmer has put some of Grossmann's work up on the web; I
just have to find Blake's and Shoul's mss and see whether he wants to
put them up to.
Best
regards
Paul
Bullock.
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]