IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Rakesh > I am not altogether clear about how Newtonian theory should > be understood as causal. Neither am I, but I do think the giant leap forward was the measurement of empirical variables in controlled situations and the use of the calculus to model the underlying mechanisms of change. A differential equation is a highly compressed statement about lawful relations between surface phenomena. It is a causal statement par excellence. Both Hegel and Marx studied the calculus. Best wishes, -Ian.
- Re: [OPE-L] Re determinism in Derrida's ghosts, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Re determinism in Derrida's ghosts, Paul Cockshott Sun 13 Nov 2005, 00:07 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Re determinism in Derrida's ghosts, Rakesh Bhandari Sun 13 Nov 2005, 04:39 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Re determinism in Derrida's ghosts, clyder Sun 13 Nov 2005, 21:28 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Re determinism in Derrida's ghosts, Howard Engelskirchen Sun 13 Nov 2005, 21:56 GMT