IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Hi Rakesh Will get around to trying to address your points. But first: > >They don't understand the unique features of scientific > >labour. So the concrete labour of astrology is not much different from > >the concrete labour of an astronomer. > > > Caricature! But perhaps the myth/science distinction is not always > so clear. Darwin for example. Not so long ago, Paris' Sorbonne University passed a doctoral dissertation, in sociology, that employed postmodern ideas to argue for the validity of astrology. -Ian.
- [OPE-L] 2005 Deutscher Prize, (continued)
- [OPE-L] 2005 Deutscher Prize, glevy Fri 25 Nov 2005, 17:26 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] 2005 Deutscher Prize, Christopher Arthur Sat 26 Nov 2005, 18:51 GMT