IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Rakesh Bhandari wrote:
On the other hand, acquiring the knack of writing in this style is much easier than acquiring a good working knowledge of a (any) scientific discipline, so it's an easier entree to getting recognition and publishing your work.
Isn't that what real scientists say about economists?
Economists are not immune to this sort of criticism; neither are Marxists. Sadly, the ability to spout a sort of fluent Marxese is sometimes valued above innovative theory or empirical work.
Allin.
- Re: [OPE-L] Derrida's ghosts, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Derrida's ghosts, Rakesh Bhandari Mon 31 Oct 2005, 04:49 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Derrida's ghosts, Ian Wright Fri 28 Oct 2005, 17:03 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Derrida's ghosts, Allin Cottrell Sat 29 Oct 2005, 00:29 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Derrida's ghosts, Rakesh Bhandari Sat 29 Oct 2005, 00:47 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Derrida's ghosts, Allin Cottrell Sat 29 Oct 2005, 02:33 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Derrida's ghosts, Michael Perelman Sat 29 Oct 2005, 02:48 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Derrida's ghosts, Rakesh Bhandari Sat 29 Oct 2005, 03:00 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Derrida's ghosts, Stephen Cullenberg Sat 29 Oct 2005, 20:10 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Derrida's ghosts, Jerry Levy Sun 30 Oct 2005, 14:49 GMT