OPE-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]

Date: [ Previous | Next ] Thread: [ Previous | Next ] Index: [ Author | Date | Thread ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

Re: [OPE-L] Say's Law

To: OPE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OPE-L] Say's Law
From: Paul Zarembka <zarembka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:55:40 -0400

You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.

> I would like the repro schema to be read primarily as a critique of the
> easy adjustment implied by Say's Law, not as a model of growth which
> dangerously suggests the infinity of capital, a la Hilferding and today
> Stedman Jones.

Or -- the schema have its own weakness a la Luxemburg.

Paul Z.

************************************************************************
RESEARCH IN POLITICAL ECONOMY,  Paul Zarembka, editor,  Elsevier Science
********************* http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka

Follow-Ups:
- [OPE-L] The West and Africa's exploitation
  - From: Rakesh Bhandari

References:
- Re: [OPE-L] Say's Law
  - From: Rakesh Bhandari

Prev by Date: Re: [OPE-L] Say's Law
Next by Date: [OPE-L] The West and Africa's exploitation
Previous by thread: Re: [OPE-L] Say's Law
Next by thread: [OPE-L] The West and Africa's exploitation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: [OPE-L] Capital in General, (continued)

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]