IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
---------------------------- Original Message ------------------------ Subject: Corruption Perceptions Index From: "Jurriaan Bendien" <adsl675281@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, October 19, 2005 2:37 pm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Not sure whether corruption fits into OPE-L discussion of the laws of motion of capital, but anyway here's a link to the new Transparency International index: http://ww1.transparency.org/cpi/2005/cpi2005_infocus.html#cpi The TI Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) ranks countries in terms of the degree to which corruption is perceived to exist among public officials and politicians. It is a composite index, drawing on corruption-related data in expert surveys carried out by a variety of reputable institutions. It reflects the views of business people and analysts from around the world, including experts who are locals in the countries evaluated In terms of my previous comments about the public sector, notice how in this world of ours, you can have a large public sector (measured in employment terms) with low corruption (Denmark), a large public sector with high corruption (Myanmar), a small public sector with low corruption (Hong Kong), and a small public sector with high corruption (Bangladesh). Thus, the actual size of the public sector doesn't seem to correlate strongly with *any particular degree* of corruption, although you can say, that countries with low corruption typically have a public sector employing 20% or more of the employed labour force. The popular image is of "corrupt officials fleecing the public", but if you crunch the numbers, you actually find that there is proportionally more bureaucracy in the private sector than in the public sector - in terms of the army of administrative workers. If bureaucracy is blamed on bad laws, the question is whether bureaucracy would disappear, if you simplified and reduced the existing legislation - but empirically somehow I doubt it. The laws exist, because capitalist competition exists, and it seems that the root of modern bureaucracy is precisely the mediation of this competition. Jurriaan
- Re: [OPE-L] Value and Exploitation, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Value and Exploitation, Jerry Levy Sun 23 Oct 2005, 14:27 GMT
- [OPE-L] Antonio Gramsci is Dead!, glevy Thu 20 Oct 2005, 14:06 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] Antonio Gramsci is Dead!, glevy Thu 20 Oct 2005, 18:40 GMT
- [OPE-L] Nov 3: The WTO Meeting In Hong Kong: What's at Stake for the Poor?, Jerry Levy Thu 20 Oct 2005, 01:21 GMT
- [OPE-L] Jurriaan on the Corruption Perceptions Index, glevy Wed 19 Oct 2005, 19:35 GMT
- [OPE-L] Kashmir Earthquake Relief, Rakesh Bhandari Tue 18 Oct 2005, 15:48 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] [Jurriaan re] Rick Wolff, Personal debts and US Capitalism, glevy Tue 18 Oct 2005, 01:01 GMT
- [OPE-L] G20: Reform the IMF and World bank, glevy Mon 17 Oct 2005, 19:46 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] G20: Reform the IMF and World bank, Patrick Bond Mon 17 Oct 2005, 21:05 GMT