OPE-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]

Date: [ Previous | Next ] Thread: [ Previous | Next ] Index: [ Author | Date | Thread ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

Re: [OPE-L] cockshott, Fw: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics and financial services

To: OPE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OPE-L] cockshott, Fw: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics and financial services
From: Allin Cottrell <cottrell@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:33:45 -0400

You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.

On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, Diego Guerrero wrote:

Your point (and perhaps Paul's?) does not coincide with the point
I was emphasyzing. You are changing the focus and talking about
"increases in surplus value", but I was and am talking about
"production of surplus value", irrespectively of if it is growing
or decreasing...


OK, I see.

This is the point: when it is allowed for a migration of workers
from unproductive sectors (as home and Public Administrations) to
sectors producing surplus value (as firms in deps. I , II and
III), new surplus value are obtained because they are now more
workers that produce surplus value...


I will have to think about that.  I will try to post something on
this soon.

Allin Cottrell

References:
- Re: [OPE-L] cockshott, Fw: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics and financial services
  - From: Paul Cockshott
- Re: [OPE-L] cockshott, Fw: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics and financial services
  - From: Diego Guerrero
- Re: [OPE-L] cockshott, Fw: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics and financial services
  - From: Allin Cottrell
- Re: [OPE-L] cockshott, Fw: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics and financial services
  - From: Diego Guerrero

Prev by Date: Re: [OPE-L] requesting some help
Next by Date: Re: [OPE-L] Capital in General
Previous by thread: Re: [OPE-L] cockshott, Fw: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics and financial services
Next by thread: [OPE-L] Signals of the end of the dollar standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: [OPE-L] cockshott, Fw: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics and financial services, (continued)
  - Re: [OPE-L] cockshott, Fw: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics and financial services, Paul Cockshott Mon 10 Oct 2005, 20:12 GMT
    - Re: [OPE-L] cockshott, Fw: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics and financial services, Diego Guerrero Tue 11 Oct 2005, 08:49 GMT
      
      Re: [OPE-L] cockshott, Fw: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics and financial services, Allin Cottrell Tue 11 Oct 2005, 19:27 GMT
      
      Re: [OPE-L] cockshott, Fw: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics and financial services, Diego Guerrero Tue 11 Oct 2005, 20:47 GMT
      
      Re: [OPE-L] cockshott, Fw: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics and financial services, Allin Cottrell Wed 12 Oct 2005, 23:33 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Hegel's and Smith's historical materialism?, Andrew Brown Fri 07 Oct 2005, 09:22 GMT
  - Re: [OPE-L] Hegel's and Smith's historical materialism?, ajit sinha Fri 07 Oct 2005, 09:45 GMT
  - Re: [OPE-L] Hegel's and Smith's historical materialism?, Riccardo Bellofiore Fri 07 Oct 2005, 10:16 GMT
  - Re: [OPE-L] Hegel's and Smith's historical materialism?, Christopher Arthur Fri 07 Oct 2005, 11:41 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]