IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Surely I didn't express myself adequately. I meant that, in a pure model of productive, labour circulation, etc. are unproductive and general costs, ie "faux frais". But if we take the state into account, we should add new faux frais: all money that capitalists have to transfer to the state.
----- Original Message ----- From: <glevy@xxxxxxxxx> To: <OPE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 9:42 PM Subject: Re: [OPE-L] faux frais and the armaments industry
re Diego's message ofg 10/3: <http://ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu/~cottrell/ope/archive/0510/0029.html >
All taxes are faux frais in a pure model with no State.
In a pure model with no state, why would there by taxes?
In solidarity, Jerry
- Re: [OPE-L] translation of innerer Durchschnitt, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] translation of innerer Durchschnitt, Michael Heinrich Mon 10 Oct 2005, 00:38 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] translation of innerer Durchschnitt, Hanno Pahl Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:36 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Hegel's and Smith's historical materialism?, Paul Bullock Mon 10 Oct 2005, 22:05 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] faux frais and the armaments industry, glevy Thu 06 Oct 2005, 19:42 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] faux frais and the armaments industry, Diego Guerrero Fri 07 Oct 2005, 09:54 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo and Marx on embodiment, Andrew Brown Thu 06 Oct 2005, 10:27 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo and Marx on embodiment, Gerald_A_Levy Thu 06 Oct 2005, 11:43 GMT
- [OPE-L] Hegel's and Smith's historical materialism?, Gerald_A_Levy Thu 06 Oct 2005, 13:47 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Hegel's and Smith's historical materialism?, Christopher Arthur Thu 06 Oct 2005, 20:34 GMT