IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
>Am I off-track here? Did Smith have a historical materialist >perspective? Did Hegel? > >In solidarity, Jerry No. Smith gives a theory of history going from agriculture to the twons to foreign trade and then ruefully admits the real development was exactly the opposite! For a study of Hegel's early work see my chapter on him in my book 'The New Dialectic and Marx's Capital' It is true he gives more importancce to labour in the early work but it is still in the interests of the spirit. Chris 17 Bristol Road, Brighton, BN2 1AP, England
- Re: [OPE-L] faux frais and the armaments industry, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] faux frais and the armaments industry, Diego Guerrero Fri 07 Oct 2005, 09:54 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo and Marx on embodiment, Andrew Brown Thu 06 Oct 2005, 10:27 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo and Marx on embodiment, Gerald_A_Levy Thu 06 Oct 2005, 11:43 GMT
- [OPE-L] Hegel's and Smith's historical materialism?, Gerald_A_Levy Thu 06 Oct 2005, 13:47 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Hegel's and Smith's historical materialism?, Christopher Arthur Thu 06 Oct 2005, 20:34 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo and Marx on embodiment, Andrew Brown Thu 06 Oct 2005, 11:27 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo and Marx on embodiment, Andrew Brown Thu 06 Oct 2005, 12:12 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo and Marx on embodiment, Andrew Brown Thu 06 Oct 2005, 15:56 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo and Marx on embodiment, Rakesh Bhandari Thu 06 Oct 2005, 16:20 GMT