IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Apologies, I wrote: "Hence we have value as a 'congelation' of value 'pure and simple', i.e. abstract, not an atom of natural matter contained in it." I should have written: value as a congelation of labour 'pure and simple'... Andy
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo and Marx on embodiment, Andrew Brown Thu 06 Oct 2005, 10:27 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo and Marx on embodiment, Gerald_A_Levy Thu 06 Oct 2005, 11:43 GMT
- [OPE-L] Hegel's and Smith's historical materialism?, Gerald_A_Levy Thu 06 Oct 2005, 13:47 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Hegel's and Smith's historical materialism?, Christopher Arthur Thu 06 Oct 2005, 20:34 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo and Marx on embodiment, Andrew Brown Thu 06 Oct 2005, 11:27 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo and Marx on embodiment, Andrew Brown Thu 06 Oct 2005, 12:12 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo and Marx on embodiment, Andrew Brown Thu 06 Oct 2005, 15:56 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Ricardo and Marx on embodiment, Rakesh Bhandari Thu 06 Oct 2005, 16:20 GMT
- [OPE-L] [Jurriaan re] The "intermediation society" and the "soul of capitalism", glevy Tue 04 Oct 2005, 20:55 GMT