IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Jerry (et al), The URPE Summer Conference was, as usual, quite stimulating and enjoyable. I am not authorized to give an official evaluation, of course, but ... OPE members present: Allin C., Gil (of course!). Not sure who else. Robin Hahnel spoke in a plenary with Allin, along with Gar Alperowitz. Another presentation was Rick Wolff and Steve Resnick, on the USSR from their "surplus approach" perspective. Overall theme of the conference was "Alternatives" -- which some of us at least don't mind interpreting as a call to discuss *socialism* -- and I would say a beginning was made in this regard. Check www.urpe.org for the full program. One thing I would say is that the audience responses to socialism presentations (including my talk) as one person described it to me, "socialism 101." The questions, while friendly, tended to be elementary and digressive, rather than focused on theoretical issues and on differences among the various alternatives presented. Responding to the matter of the role and fate of markets in a maturing socialist society (and prospects for their transcendence or abolition), one questioner asked me if I thought *flea markets* would be abolished! (She apparently enjoys them.) Robin H. later said that he has encountered that question before, although I had not. I don't think I answered it very well, but subsequently I have thought of a good answer, which is to use the question as an opportunity to think about the social relations underlying markets. I.e., if we "think" flea markets as fun places in which to find unusual or antique household goods, knick-knacks, etc., shouldn't we also think them from the point of view fo the casual tradespeople who have to try to make a living selling merchandise in that way, and about the larger political economy that creates a class of people consigned to the informal sector because they have no -- well -- *alternatives*! It is always the underlying social relations that matter. Well, that's not a real summary of the conference, just a few thoughts. Best to all, david ----- Original Message ----- From: glevy@xxxxxxxxx Date: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 4:48 pm Subject: Re: [OPE-L] David Gordon Memorial Lecture > Hi David L: > > (Other than your paper) was there anything particularly > interesting, scandalous or exciting that happened at the > URPE Summer Camp? Were there any other OPE-L members > present (like Gary? or Gil? or ...?). > > In solidarity, Jerry > > PS to Paolo: I'm not back yet. I'm still on passage > -- but I'll be returning to the life on land and > work next week. :-( The comment that you made was in > reply to a message authored by Jurriaan which I forwarded > to the list. > > > ----------------------------------------------------- > This email has been automatically scanned for viruses. > However, it might still contain undetectable virus(es). > Addressee should take precautions in opening any unsolicited emails. > -- DoIT, John Jay College of Criminal Justice -1- > >
- [OPE-L] Marx Myths and Legends, Gerald_A_Levy Mon 29 Aug 2005, 02:47 GMT
- [OPE-L] Carmageddon and Karl Marx, glevy Wed 24 Aug 2005, 21:21 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] Carmageddon and Karl Marx, glevy Fri 26 Aug 2005, 20:09 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] David Gordon Memorial Lecture, glevy Wed 24 Aug 2005, 20:48 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] David Gordon Memorial Lecture, dlaibman Thu 25 Aug 2005, 21:26 GMT
- [OPE-L] David Gordon lecture, dlaibman Wed 24 Aug 2005, 18:53 GMT
- [OPE-L] Farjoun & Machover's "laws of chaos", Ian Wright Mon 22 Aug 2005, 16:26 GMT
- [OPE-L] Cuba 5 Victory, glevy Wed 17 Aug 2005, 15:22 GMT
- [OPE-L] Marx and Philosophy Society Conference, glevy Wed 17 Aug 2005, 15:20 GMT