OPE-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]

Date: [ Previous | Next ] Thread: [ Previous | Next ] Index: [ Author | Date | Thread ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

Re: [OPE-L] various

To: OPE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OPE-L] various
From: Michael Perelman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 10:02:57 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.

When I said that no economists gave an economic reason, I was thinking of theoretical
reasoning.  Just to say that it would cut into profits -- or even eliminate them -- does
not seem to be more than standard business-talk.

On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 11:04:30AM +0100, Paul Bullock wrote:
> Well, Senior of course, as per Vol 1 Capital
>

--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OPE-L] various
  - From: Paul Bullock

References:
- Re: [OPE-L] various
  - From: Paul Bullock

Prev by Date: Re: [OPE-L] various
Next by Date: Re: [OPE-L] Venezuela
Previous by thread: Re: [OPE-L] various
Next by thread: Re: [OPE-L] various
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: [OPE-L] length of the working day, (continued)
  - Re: [OPE-L] length of the working day, Michael Perelman Wed 03 Aug 2005, 15:28 GMT
- [OPE-L] Class Struggles in China, glevy Wed 03 Aug 2005, 15:23 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] various, Francisco Paulo Cipolla Mon 01 Aug 2005, 19:29 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: [OPE-L] various, Paul Bullock Wed 03 Aug 2005, 16:41 GMT
    - Re: [OPE-L] various, Michael Perelman Wed 03 Aug 2005, 17:03 GMT
      
      Re: [OPE-L] various, Paul Bullock Thu 04 Aug 2005, 23:49 GMT
- [OPE-L] SET OPE-L MAIL POSTPONE, Simon Mohun Mon 01 Aug 2005, 17:53 GMT
  - Re: [OPE-L] SET, OPE-L Administrator Wed 03 Aug 2005, 15:23 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]