IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Hi Michael P: Well, I can't check on any sources now, but surely someone must have used a "competitiveness" argument against the 8-hour-day. I.e. domestic firms, if forced to comply with a limit on the working day, would be at a competitive disadvantage in relation to firms from other nations which had no such limit. I suspect, in the context of the 19th Century, conservatives also made a "laziness" argument -- since the working class was deemed to be slothful. I bet you could also find a conservative argument (from the Church?) that the 8-hour-day would increase alcoholism and othere sorts of sinful activities like adultery. After all, the working class with too much time on its hands would surely fall into all sorts of moral depravities. In solidarity, Jerry
- [OPE-L] Homecoming, (continued)
- [OPE-L] Homecoming, Philip Dunn Sun 07 Aug 2005, 20:52 GMT
- [OPE-L] Round up the usual suspects, Philip Dunn Sun 14 Aug 2005, 19:10 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Venezuela, Francisco Paulo Cipolla Thu 04 Aug 2005, 20:17 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Venezuela, Paul Bullock Thu 04 Aug 2005, 23:51 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] length of the working day, glevy Wed 03 Aug 2005, 15:23 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] length of the working day, Michael Perelman Wed 03 Aug 2005, 15:28 GMT
- [OPE-L] Class Struggles in China, glevy Wed 03 Aug 2005, 15:23 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] various, Francisco Paulo Cipolla Mon 01 Aug 2005, 19:29 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] various, Paul Bullock Wed 03 Aug 2005, 16:41 GMT