IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Maybe an electronic toast! Too bad we could not be together to celebrate! Jerry I enjoy you writing the places you are going through. I will try to check on a map. Paulo glevy@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Several brief interventions: > > 1) Re the length of the working day > The public debate on the 8 hour day occurred during Marx's > lifetime and his theory of absolute surplus value could be seen, in > part, as an intervention in that struggle and a reply to both > reactionary opponents of the 8-hour-day and liberal and "utopian" > advocates who justified support for the 8-hour-day in moral terms > (i.e. what was "fair"). > > 2) Re conspiracy theories and Marxism > A futher thought: Marxists attempt to put the question of > whether or not there are conspiracies in historical context. For > instance, they attempt to look for historical and structural > patterns. A couple of examples: after the coup in Venezuela, > most radicals (Marxists included) charged that the coup > was planned by the US and the CIA, etc. The US government, of > course, denied any role or advance knowledge. Even in the > absence of "beyond a reasonable doubt" proof, radicals and > Marxists were _right_ to make this claim (and further evidence to > that effect has been revealed in the last couple of years). > In other words, given the existing pattern and history of the > US in terms of its relations with radical governments in Latin > America that it dislikes, this claim was justified. Another > example: in New York City, they are saying that the NYPD is going to > have "random checks" of backpacks and bags of subway and > mass transportation riders. I will claim -- in the absence of > any hard proof -- that the City _will_ nonetheless use this > occasion to have _non_-random searches of people who fit > their (racist and discriminatory) profile and/or radicals. > In making this claim, I am not being paranoid. Rather, this > belief is informed by a _history_ of other occasions of > police (and mayoral, and gubanatorial, and federal) abuse of > civil liberties. > > 3) Query > September 5 will be the ***TENTH ANNIVERSARY OF OPE-L!*** > Do you have any ideas about how we should celebrate that occasion? > > In solidarity, Jerry > Peaks Island and Portland
- Re: [OPE-L] Venezuela, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Venezuela, Paul Bullock Thu 04 Aug 2005, 23:51 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] length of the working day, glevy Wed 03 Aug 2005, 15:23 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] length of the working day, Michael Perelman Wed 03 Aug 2005, 15:28 GMT
- [OPE-L] Class Struggles in China, glevy Wed 03 Aug 2005, 15:23 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] various, Francisco Paulo Cipolla Mon 01 Aug 2005, 19:29 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] various, Paul Bullock Wed 03 Aug 2005, 16:41 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] various, Michael Perelman Wed 03 Aug 2005, 17:03 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] various, Paul Bullock Thu 04 Aug 2005, 23:49 GMT
- [OPE-L] SET OPE-L MAIL POSTPONE, Simon Mohun Mon 01 Aug 2005, 17:53 GMT