IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
> This is another > lesson in the fact that those who call themselves Marxists are in no sense > automatically to be considered effective revolutionaries or even > considered as such by others , whatever their own subjective view. ( This > is particularly the case in academia in my experience) What is important is > the deed. Paul B, It is even more the case, from my experience, for "leaders" of small, Marxist political formations. So many of these groups believe that they represent the "vanguard" of the revolution; hence the leaders are the vanguard of the vanguard ... at least in their own minds. It must be a very "heady" experience .... This is one of the reasons that there have been so many Marxist cults. Of course, this is less likely to occur in larger, mass parties which are firmly rooted in working-class communities. > On a number of occasions. Lenin pointed out that the enemies of the > working class were forced to call themselves Marxists even to get a hearing, > such was the success of Marx's work. That was a time long, long ago. In solidarity, Jerry
- [OPE-L] Chavez and Marxism, Paul Zarembka Thu 26 May 2005, 11:32 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Chavez and Marxism, Paul Bullock Thu 26 May 2005, 17:09 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Chavez and Marxism, Paul Zarembka Thu 26 May 2005, 17:32 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] Chavez and Marxism, Paul Bullock Sat 28 May 2005, 22:45 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Chavez and Marxism, Gerald_A_Levy Sun 29 May 2005, 11:08 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Chavez and Marxism, Paul Zarembka Sun 29 May 2005, 12:45 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Chavez and Marxism, Gerald_A_Levy Sun 29 May 2005, 15:15 GMT
- [OPE-L] _Empire_ Online, glevy Wed 25 May 2005, 20:38 GMT
- [OPE-L] "Is It Sustainable? Hugo Chavez's Economy", Paul Zarembka Wed 25 May 2005, 12:36 GMT