IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
> Further to the forward of Galloways
address, what, if any has
> been the domestic US coverage and
response to this?
Hi Bill,
This was much bigger news in the UK than it
was in the US.
The network TV news programs did not have
enough time to cover
this event -- they were too busy having
specials on "Religion in
America", "faith-based initiatives", and
"The Da Vinci Code".
In solidarity, Jerry
|
- Re: [OPE-L] George Galloway on the way forward, Paul Zarembka Tue 24 May 2005, 00:27 GMT
- [OPE-L] Galloway visits Congress, Paul Bullock Mon 23 May 2005, 21:49 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] Galloway visits Congress, Bill Cochrane Tue 24 May 2005, 21:33 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Galloway visits Congress, Paul Zarembka Wed 25 May 2005, 12:28 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Galloway visits Congress, Gerald_A_Levy Wed 25 May 2005, 12:58 GMT
- [OPE-L] Makoto Itoh, The Japanese Economy in Structural Difficulties, glevy Mon 23 May 2005, 20:53 GMT
- [OPE-L] Workers states, Paul Cockshott Mon 23 May 2005, 14:10 GMT
- Message not available
- Re: [OPE-L] Workers states, michael a. lebowitz Mon 23 May 2005, 15:12 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] Workers states, Paul Cockshott Mon 23 May 2005, 15:22 GMT