IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
> But one could also say that anarchism was responsible for the Haymarket > bomb and that it greatly harmed the labor movement. If so, objectively, > such action supported capital and the state. Paul Z, What do you know that other labor historians don't know? I have never seen nor heard of any credible evidence that anarchists were responsible for making or throwing the bomb at Haymarket Square in Chicago in 1886. > > I think, though, that given John's latest clarifications there should > > be _no_ question about whether he is supportive of the revolutionary > > process in Venezuela or what side of the barricades he is on. > Aren't we getting a bit too personal about John as an individual. Aren't > we trying to discuss a larger issue? We should be trying to get at understanding a larger issue, but the thread that you started on April 16 was explicitly directed towards John: "Query to John Holloway: What's your position on the Bolivarian Revolution?" That query has now been answered. In solidarity, Jerry
- Re: [OPE-L] The Paris Commune, the State, and Venezuela, glevy Thu 19 May 2005, 13:12 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] The Paris Commune, the State, and Venezuela, Paul Zarembka Thu 19 May 2005, 14:23 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] The Paris Commune, the State, and Venezuela, glevy Thu 19 May 2005, 15:32 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] The Paris Commune, the State, and Venezuela, Paul Zarembka Thu 19 May 2005, 19:48 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Haymarket and Holloway, Gerald_A_Levy Thu 19 May 2005, 20:40 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Haymarket and Holloway, Paul Zarembka Fri 20 May 2005, 00:26 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Haymarket and Holloway, Gerald_A_Levy Fri 20 May 2005, 07:55 GMT
- [OPE-L] It takes two to tango, Gerald_A_Levy Wed 18 May 2005, 12:19 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [OPE-L] It takes two to tango, Gerald_A_Levy Wed 18 May 2005, 12:24 GMT