IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Most anarchists wouldn't agree that the Paris Commune was a state.
If you've read John's book, tell me what you think he means by the state and its relation to the Commune; he made efforts to ground his argument in Marx but I don't recall any mention.
is important is that in the ongoing class conflicts in Venezuela, one takes the side of the poor and working class against bourgeois forces and the reaction. I.e. the critical question is: which side of the barricades are you on? I have no fear that John H or other autonomists (or anarchists, for that matter) will find themselves on the wrong side of the barricades in Venezuela. Do you really think that if there was another coup attempt or an imperialist provocation that John would be indifferent or on the wrong side?
Haven't the slightest idea. There are anarchists and self-defined marxist-leninists in opposition (the latter were in the opposition coalition)./m
Michael A. Lebowitz Professor Emeritus Economics Department Simon Fraser University Burnaby, B.C., Canada V5A 1S6
Currently based in Venezuela. Can be reached at Residencias Anauco Suites Departamento 601 Parque Central, Zona Postal 1010, Oficina 1 Caracas, Venezuela (58-212) 573-4111 fax: (58-212) 573-7724
- [OPE-L] Zapatistas Under Attack, glevy Mon 16 May 2005, 22:34 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Query to John Holloway: What's your position on the Bolivarian revolution?, glevy Mon 16 May 2005, 13:15 GMT
- [OPE-L] response to John Holloway, michael a. lebowitz Sun 15 May 2005, 13:27 GMT
- [OPE-L] The Paris Commune, the State, and Venezuela, Gerald_A_Levy Sun 15 May 2005, 21:28 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] The Paris Commune, the State, and Venezuela, michael a. lebowitz Mon 16 May 2005, 14:06 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] The Paris Commune, the State, and Venezuela, Paul Zarembka Thu 19 May 2005, 10:07 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] response to John Holloway, Gerald_A_Levy Sun 15 May 2005, 21:36 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] response to John Holloway, michael a. lebowitz Mon 16 May 2005, 14:11 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] response to John Holloway, Gerald_A_Levy Mon 16 May 2005, 23:49 GMT