IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
It's also interesting to note that Sraffa claimed that the purpose of _PCMC_ was critique. Yet, there is hardly a mention of any of the marginalist authors that were being subjected to critique! I believe that is because Sraffa thought that _PCMC_ was a critique to the extent that it represented a *superior* theory of the subject matter of capitalism. It's like a variation on the old slogan: the best defense is a good offense. If Sraffa could develop a theory which in every respect was superior to marginalism then that represented a critique _of_ marginalism. Wasn't Sraffa _in this respect_ following the footsteps of Marx? In solidarity, Jerry
- Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s, Michael Heinrich Fri 22 Apr 2005, 13:05 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy, Gerald_A_Levy Fri 22 Apr 2005, 14:16 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s, Francisco Paulo Cipolla Mon 25 Apr 2005, 18:49 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s, Paul Zarembka Wed 27 Apr 2005, 18:38 GMT
- [OPE-L] Critique in Sraffa and Marx, glevy Wed 27 Apr 2005, 21:28 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy in Australia Since the Mid 1970s, Paul Zarembka Tue 05 Apr 2005, 16:51 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] Marxist Political Economy?, Gerald_A_Levy Wed 06 Apr 2005, 12:13 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] John H on capitalist and anti-capitalist conceptions oftime, John Holloway Fri 01 Apr 2005, 19:59 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L] 'Capital & Class' FREE ONLINE !, Francisco Paulo Cipolla Fri 01 Apr 2005, 14:01 GMT