OPE-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]
Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?

You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it. 

I calculated it myself from data published on the web
by Gold Fields and Mineral Services Ltd. They gave aggregate
mining output per each period, I worked out the rest 

-----Original Message-----
From: OPE-L [mailto:OPE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of glevy@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: 22 April 2005 16:40
To: OPE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?

> see the accompanying table that gives growth of stock in million
> troy ounces.

Hi Paul C:  What is the source for the table that you attached to
your last message?  / In solidarity, Jerry
[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]